
Defensive Driving Course For 4x4's
#1
Posted 15 September 2004 - 08:20 AM
I wish the Federal Highway Administration and Department of Transportation would get together with the Department of Motorvehicles in all states and offer some kind of SUV training course to anyone that owns an SUV much like a defensive driving course. This course should teach people the dangers of an SUV, what they can and can't do & offer a hands on driving course so they don't make the same mistakes many others have made.
The current defensive driving course will give people a 10% reduction in their insurance rates and remove some points from there license.
I don't think the points reduction is good for this course but the 10% insurance reduction would be a great idea.
I know Jeep owners pay higher insurance rates for their CJs and Wranglers because they are "off-road vehicles"
This is just an idea I have that spawned from another post that I didn't want to go too far off topic.
So what do you all think?
Police Package
351W
E4OD
31" Tires
Going through a complete restore
http://fullsizebronc...ail.php?id=1650
#3
Guest_Desert Donk_*
Posted 15 September 2004 - 09:58 AM
What would you think about a booklet explaining the unique driving requirements of SUV's. It might be more cost effective as on the whole I have no idea how much money SUV's cost the insurance companies because folks don't know how to drive them. Here is another article from today's newspaper here, but they don't mention how many were SUV's.
Local News
Nearly Half of Fatal Accidents On State Highways Involved Rollovers
09-15-2004 3:05 AM
(Phoenix, AZ) -- Department of Public Safety officials say nearly half of all the fatal accidents on Arizona highways last month involved a vehicle leaving the road and rolling over. DPS reports a small percent of the rollovers involved tire problems. The majority, though, were linked to drivers not paying attention or being too tired. Of the 64 people who were killed in crashes last month, 32 died in rollovers and weren't wearing seat belts.
#4
Posted 15 September 2004 - 01:18 PM
The news article also has some good info but you are right there is no mention as to how many were SUVs or even Tractor Trailers. Those numbers also include the big wreck in Tonopah. That one stands out in my mind because I used to drive Tractor Trailer and remember running out of hours there for 3 days. Great food at that truckstop.
Police Package
351W
E4OD
31" Tires
Going through a complete restore
http://fullsizebronc...ail.php?id=1650
#5
Posted 15 September 2004 - 01:31 PM
http://ftw.truckmoxi...ery.ten?id=9316
#6
Guest_BigNasty_*
Posted 15 September 2004 - 05:15 PM
BUT in the real world.. until there is a heavy fine and other penalties for being stoopit... such as cell phones on the ears.. TVs, playstations, reading the paper or books etc while driving, remote controls for the CD player (which is in arms reach anyways.. )
then we will always have the high numbers of accidents we have now.
The biggest factor I see is peoples driving habits in general.. it doesn't matter what they drive as I have seen man sporty cars flipped and rolled for the same errors in judgement that causes an SUV roll-over.
Until peoples mentalities behind the wheel changes and all the un-needed distractions go away.. the only good that will come is cheaper insurance rates.
Same difference as cheaper rates for equipping your vehicle with an alarm..
Alarms don't stop break-ins etc and usually wake you up for no reason.
I know.. I'm just a ray of happiness tonight

#7
Posted 16 September 2004 - 02:30 PM
#8
Guest_Windchaser_*
Posted 17 September 2004 - 08:21 AM

#9
Posted 17 September 2004 - 09:05 AM
You are right to a point with too few people with enough knowledge however, if we can get all of the auto manufacturers that offer some kind of SUV together it might work for people using their own vehicle. The Ford people should know all of there vehicles, Chevy should know there's and so on.
The hardest part would be to get the auto makers on board with the insurance companies.
The tests have been done by Car & Driver Magazine, J. D. Power and a few others. We shouldn't have much trouble getting the reports from them as I believe they have been made public.
I am trying to contact my insurance agent to find out where to start with this.
I am also going to try to contact Ford and see what they think and give them the address of this post.
More to come, I hope.......
Police Package
351W
E4OD
31" Tires
Going through a complete restore
http://fullsizebronc...ail.php?id=1650
#10
Posted 17 September 2004 - 12:10 PM
#11
Posted 17 September 2004 - 12:50 PM
Check your email. I have also been working on getting people involved on my end. I am working with Ford's Test Track Division and the people form "Camp Jeep" as well as the NYS Insurance Department.
This looks like it could go all the way

Police Package
351W
E4OD
31" Tires
Going through a complete restore
http://fullsizebronc...ail.php?id=1650
#13
Posted 18 September 2004 - 01:27 PM
1988 Bronco Custom, 302 EFI, C-6 AT, Ford 8.8". parting out
1986 Bronco Custom, 300I-6, NP435
#14
Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:05 PM
#15
Posted 22 September 2004 - 11:15 AM
#16
Posted 22 September 2004 - 01:07 PM
#17
Posted 22 September 2004 - 06:06 PM
It's basic physics; a vehicle with a lower center of gravity has less of a tendency to roll over. This is something that the car buying (SUV buying) public needs to be educated in, and it will take efforts like the one going on here to point this out.
You will never hear anything about rollover potential from a car dealer or on a TV commercial!
#18
Posted 26 October 2004 - 10:28 PM
Absolutely no two handle the same, but there are common characteristics. Two of the most important I think is the increased stopping distance, and the higher center of gravity. Then there's the basic issue of size.There are no two S.U.V.s that handle the same. Although you may have two of the same make, model, and year. suspension wear, different tires, and road conditions, make them handle nothing alike.
I just wish someone would offer a class for these idiots to learn to park. If I can put my 88 bronco in the middle of a space without it being crooked, why can't half the other drivers at least get almost in the space with their little "SUVs"?
I'm no pro offroader, but I think this is a great idea. If there's anything I can do here in GA to help please let me know.
#19
Posted 27 October 2004 - 09:46 AM
#20
Guest_billybroncojr_*
Posted 27 October 2004 - 06:28 PM
I own a mini-van, I hate to admit it but I do, and I refuse to put anything beyond a cd player in it. There is no place on the road for a TV! We are going to raise a generation of kids that never know how to get anywhere because the spent their childhood in the backseat watching their favorite DVD of Barney a million times and can't find the corner store now because they never watched where mom and dad was driving them!
I fill my kids head every time a traffic sitiation occurs. I ask them where we are and how to get home from there. I also let them sit on my lap and steer the vehicle. I live on a private road so there is no traffic, but it give them the experiance of driving. They won't be the 16 year olds that have never been behind the wheel. By the time they are 16 they should be a step ahead I hope.
Education and experiance is the key.
My-2-Cents,
Jeff
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users