Jump to content


What's Up Bronco Lovers


8 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_jayjs_*

Guest_jayjs_*
  • Guest

Posted 29 March 2004 - 09:35 PM

Hey guys i've got an '80 Bronco XLT w/ a 302 and I'm gonna upgrade to either a 460 or 400. The 460 is complete and the 400 is a crate longblock that I got thinking it was a 460 (I f'd up!). Which do you think would be the best choice based upon swap ease and performance? I know the 460 will require motor mount adapters, but I dont know if the 400 is the same as the small block regarding the engine mounts, do you? Anyways, I finally registered although I've had my Bronco for almost 4 yrs now. I look forward to talking w/ all of you and thanks for any input you may have. John (Brookfield, Illinois)

Attached Thumbnails

  • IMGA0052.JPG


#2 BLADE262US

BLADE262US

    F-Series Pimp

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 281 posts
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Ford there is nothing else =)

Posted 29 March 2004 - 10:23 PM

Hello the 460 and the 400 use the same motor mounts and transmission so whichever one you decide to use youll have to do the same changes for both . If you go for the theres no replacement for displacement then id go with the 460 . The 351 m also uses the same motor mounts and transmission as these 2 . :D

#3 Justshootme84

Justshootme84

    F-Series Commander

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 914 posts
  • Location:Palacios, TX
  • Interests:4wd trucks, hunting, fishing, music

Posted 29 March 2004 - 11:28 PM

I would definitely go with the 460cid, hands down!!! Howdy & Welcome!!!
1984 Bronco XLT, 351W H.O., C-6 AT, Ford 9", SkyJ 6" lift, 35" tires on MT Classic rims, S&W Racecars 10-pt cage kit, custom "shaker" assembly.
1988 Bronco Custom, 302 EFI, C-6 AT, Ford 8.8". parting out
1986 Bronco Custom, 300I-6, NP435

#4 Ktomek06

Ktomek06

    F-Series Commander

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Location:Bay City, TX
  • Interests:Hunting, Fishing, Lifeguarding, my bronc, and a lot of other stuff.

Posted 30 March 2004 - 05:15 AM

Welcome to BroncoZone! That bronc has a lot of potential :-B ...460!!!! Dont forget to go topless this summer!

#5 shaun94

shaun94

    bronco commander

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 140 posts
  • Location:hooksett N.H.
  • Interests:playing in the MUDD!!!!!!!!!

Posted 30 March 2004 - 11:47 AM

Nice clean looking bronco, Welcome. :)>-
1988 fsb
rebuilt reman 351
32 inch tires
cd player
flowmaster exhaust
c6 transmission

#6 Guest_Guest_Indoz_*

Guest_Guest_Indoz_*
  • Guest

Posted 30 March 2004 - 01:16 PM

Welcome to this friendly forum, go for the 460, I run an F100 with 460/C6, she's a powerhouse.

#7 Guest_ddspanker_*

Guest_ddspanker_*
  • Guest

Posted 10 April 2004 - 08:03 AM

Hi and welcome!

Just curious, dose the added weight of the big block cause any suspenition problems? I would think that the extra horsepower would be an even swap for the loss of handling a lighter vechile. I say this because I thought of doing it myself.

Bob
Tucson, AZ.

Attached Thumbnails

  • 302_Cubic_Inch_Engine.jpg


#8 Guest_rlynch131_*

Guest_rlynch131_*
  • Guest

Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:12 PM

I would go for the 460!!

Like the other posts, the bell housing and mounts are the same between the 351M/400 ad the 360. I'm not sure how significant the weight difference is though. I don't think it would be significant enough to make a difference. (unless you were comming from a 300 that is)

IMHO the 460 is by far a better performer than the 400, you do have to seriously consider what this will do to your drive train though, as the added torque from a 460 will be painfull to your drive train if not medicated properly. (especially comming from a 302)

Just my 2 cents worth,

Ron
Phoenix, AZ

#9 indoz

indoz

    F-Series Mechanic

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 62 posts

Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:27 PM

The 302 is 460lbs. and the 460 is 640lbs. The only problem I found when I bought my F100, was that the engine mount restricted the size of the oil filter(about 4 inches space), I opted to put a remote system in, but am still looking for a rotating oil filter adaptor, this would look less messy and be less prone to leaking hoses.



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users