Hey guys i've got an '80 Bronco XLT w/ a 302 and I'm gonna upgrade to either a 460 or 400. The 460 is complete and the 400 is a crate longblock that I got thinking it was a 460 (I f'd up!). Which do you think would be the best choice based upon swap ease and performance? I know the 460 will require motor mount adapters, but I dont know if the 400 is the same as the small block regarding the engine mounts, do you? Anyways, I finally registered although I've had my Bronco for almost 4 yrs now. I look forward to talking w/ all of you and thanks for any input you may have. John (Brookfield, Illinois)

What's Up Bronco Lovers
Started by
Guest_jayjs_*
, Mar 29 2004 09:35 PM
8 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 29 March 2004 - 10:23 PM
Hello the 460 and the 400 use the same motor mounts and transmission so whichever one you decide to use youll have to do the same changes for both . If you go for the theres no replacement for displacement then id go with the 460 . The 351 m also uses the same motor mounts and transmission as these 2 .

#3
Posted 29 March 2004 - 11:28 PM
I would definitely go with the 460cid, hands down!!! Howdy & Welcome!!!
1984 Bronco XLT, 351W H.O., C-6 AT, Ford 9", SkyJ 6" lift, 35" tires on MT Classic rims, S&W Racecars 10-pt cage kit, custom "shaker" assembly.
1988 Bronco Custom, 302 EFI, C-6 AT, Ford 8.8". parting out
1986 Bronco Custom, 300I-6, NP435
1988 Bronco Custom, 302 EFI, C-6 AT, Ford 8.8". parting out
1986 Bronco Custom, 300I-6, NP435
#4
Posted 30 March 2004 - 05:15 AM
Welcome to BroncoZone! That bronc has a lot of potential
...460!!!! Dont forget to go topless this summer!

1994 Eddie Bauer Bronco
http://ftw.truckmoxi...ery.ten?id=9316
http://ftw.truckmoxi...ery.ten?id=9316
#7
Guest_ddspanker_*
Posted 10 April 2004 - 08:03 AM
Hi and welcome!
Just curious, dose the added weight of the big block cause any suspenition problems? I would think that the extra horsepower would be an even swap for the loss of handling a lighter vechile. I say this because I thought of doing it myself.
Bob
Tucson, AZ.
Just curious, dose the added weight of the big block cause any suspenition problems? I would think that the extra horsepower would be an even swap for the loss of handling a lighter vechile. I say this because I thought of doing it myself.
Bob
Tucson, AZ.
#8
Guest_rlynch131_*
Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:12 PM
I would go for the 460!!
Like the other posts, the bell housing and mounts are the same between the 351M/400 ad the 360. I'm not sure how significant the weight difference is though. I don't think it would be significant enough to make a difference. (unless you were comming from a 300 that is)
IMHO the 460 is by far a better performer than the 400, you do have to seriously consider what this will do to your drive train though, as the added torque from a 460 will be painfull to your drive train if not medicated properly. (especially comming from a 302)
Just my 2 cents worth,
Ron
Phoenix, AZ
Like the other posts, the bell housing and mounts are the same between the 351M/400 ad the 360. I'm not sure how significant the weight difference is though. I don't think it would be significant enough to make a difference. (unless you were comming from a 300 that is)
IMHO the 460 is by far a better performer than the 400, you do have to seriously consider what this will do to your drive train though, as the added torque from a 460 will be painfull to your drive train if not medicated properly. (especially comming from a 302)
Just my 2 cents worth,
Ron
Phoenix, AZ
#9
Posted 10 April 2004 - 03:27 PM
The 302 is 460lbs. and the 460 is 640lbs. The only problem I found when I bought my F100, was that the engine mount restricted the size of the oil filter(about 4 inches space), I opted to put a remote system in, but am still looking for a rotating oil filter adaptor, this would look less messy and be less prone to leaking hoses.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users